Blogs

Covid-19 has been a stark reminder that ending extreme poverty requires protecting gains during crises as much as making progress during better times.

The G7 communique states that G7 members have committed hundreds of millions worth of new financing for early action, disaster risk, and insurance.

The UK’s International Champion on Adaptation and Resilience for the COP29 Presidency, Anne-Marie Trevelyan, announced that the Centre for Disaster Protection will receive additional support of £5 million from the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO).

Daniel Clarke responds to agreements made on Disaster Risk Financing by calling on the G7 to agree clear solutions that reduce the cost of disasters and improve community preparation and resilience.

We summarise findings from the first large-scale evaluation that tests the impact of humanitarian cash transfers in response to a sudden climate shock, and the importance of being timely for an impactful response.

Alongside this report, the Centre is releasing a Statement of Support signed by over 40 leaders from across the across the development, humanitarian and private sectors .

New study, released by the Centre for Disaster Protection, shows consistent failure to prepare international aid before disasters strike, even when we can see a crisis coming, is putting lives at risk.

Ahead of a meeting of G7 Foreign and Development ministers next month, the Centre for Disaster Protection convened leaders from across the Crisis Lookout coalition to explore the international financial response to covid-19 and what lessons it held for world leaders as they prepare to ‘Build Back Better’ from the crisis.

Here we reflect on what covid-19 has taught us about how crises are currently funded and the changes that must be made for the system to be fit for a future which some experts have described as ‘the era of pandemics’.

Following a call by world leaders for a new global pandemic treaty, Daniel Clarke, Director of the Centre for Disaster Protection responds.

Accountability is like eating spinach: no one disagrees with it in principle. And across the disaster risk financing (DRF) world there’s certainly agreement that accountability is important. But there are real gaps in putting this into practice.

The Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Delta of Bangladesh is on the frontline of the global climate crisis.

The Crisis Lookout coalition is calling for a new system that better predicts disaster risks, such as pandemics, floods, droughts and conflicts.

The start of a new year usually brings with it a sense of expectation, hope and resolve to make improvements. 2021 should be no different.

Over the last year the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) has been designing and delivering anticipatory action pilot projects in Somalia, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Malawi .

Over the course of the next year, Oxford Policy Management (OPM) will be working with the Centre for Disaster Protection to understand one of the most common forms of disaster response financing—expenditure reallocation.

Covid-19 has demonstrated, more than ever before, the weakness of our current begging bowl approach to funding disasters, where the money is found after disaster strikes and is given in a discretionary manner.

We spend a lot of time considering what ‘good’ disaster risk financing (DRF) looks like in practice. Here we share our current working list, our ‘7 habits of highly effective DRF’.

The Centre for Disaster Protection was proud to be part of this year’s Climate:Red, the global climate change summit organised by the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC).

Daniel Clarke, Director of the Centre for Disaster Protection, joined others at Risk Informed-Early Action Partnership, in a ‘Call for Collaboration’ at the IFRC’s virtual global summit Climate:Red